Every writer goes through moments where a critique effects them in a negative way. Whether they beat themselves up over it or get angry/defensive, it happens, especially when they are being pummeled with several at once. This is a hard industry and it takes a lot of humility to get through.
There is a right way and a wrong way to handle it when you get upset over these things. Here are some tips:
1. Wait before reacting
If you choose to respond to the person, it's better to do so when you're not consumed by emotions. It helps you behave more professionally and keeps you from being insulting or defensive. (Which can make you look very full of yourself, even when you're actually insecure.)
Not to mention that sometimes, after you think about a critique for awhile, you might decide that the person is actually right, even though your instincts fought against it at first. This has happened to me many times as I've improved as a writer. Sometimes it's hard to hear a critique, sometimes you weren't quite ready for it or overwhelmed by it (or maybe they worded it wrong), but over time, it starts making sense and you agree with it. Then you will feel like a bad person later if you yelled at them over something that eventually helped you.
2. Put their opinion into perspective
Critiquers are fellow writers usually. They sympathize with what you are going through. It may be hard to hear an opinion about something you've poured your heart into, but they wouldn't say it if they didn't believe in your manuscript.
I've given my manuscripts to people who didn't believe in them and didn't bother to read through even the first chapter. That's how you can tell they don't believe in it or don't care, they don't read it. If someone is actually reading through the whole thing, then they like it and support you.
They are teachers, not rivals. They make mistakes because they are not infallible and some of their advice might not be right for you, but they're just trying to help. You might see things wrong with their writing and think,"How dare they judge me when they can't do such and such right!" But the truth is they have different strengths and weaknesses than you and can help you be stronger in those areas as well. You're helping each other improve.
3. Communicate
If you don't express ahead of time that you're just looking for feedback on plot holes and not on characters or that you just want help with your grammar and don't care what they think about the depressing ending, then they might give you opinions on the wrong things, which will frustrate you and could cause an argument because of the misunderstanding. Good communication can give you the kind of critique you're looking for. It's better to discuss before anyone reads anything what both your expectations are.
4. Respect their opinion
There have been times when critique partners argued with me about critiques I gave them and convinced me of nothing. A critique is someone's personal reaction to your work. Whether it's an educated reaction or not, it was still the impression they got from your piece. And saying,"No, your reaction was wrong" isn't going to make them suddenly change their mind. In fact, you might make them angry with you.
I critiqued something for someone once and was given an e-mail back where they argued with every single point I made. Not one or two points, all of the points. I immediately realized that I wasted my time. Even if I was wrong like they said I was about everything, I still didn't help them, which means all my effort had been pointless. It made me wonder why I gave my opinion if this person didn't value opinions other than their own.
With critique partners, we're collecting reactions to a story as a whole, so we can get the information we need to receive more positive reactions once we're published. You don't have to change everything that they ask you to or agree with anything they say. I expect my critique partners to have different views of their (and my own) manuscripts than I do.
View it as a survey that they're filling out. You'll analyze the data later and make your decisions based on that information you collected. It is a scientific experiment about how the public might react to your work (based on a small sample of people you surveyed), not a debate over who is right or wrong. It will prepare you for the kind of negative reactions you might get to your work if you don't change what they ask you to. Even if you change nothing, that's more valuable than you'd think because it prepares you for some of the negative reviews you might receive.
5. Don't rant about it over social media
Let's say one of your critique partners says that you use too many adverbs and after you publish, you say,"Ha! She said I used too many adverbs, but look how many books I've sold. She was wrong." People will suddenly start looking for those adverbs and see if you're doing things as correctly as you say you are or if the critique partner was right. And you'll look conceited, like you think you can do no wrong, even though more likely than not, you'll view it as you trying to defend yourself.
6. Find a friend you can complain to
With a friend, you can actually let your guard down and be as whiny and immature as you need to be. You can even insult the person if you want to and it won't effect your career at all. By finding the right avenue to release your emotions into, you can still keep your professional image up while not being forced to hold everything in.
Because let's face it, no matter how mature we are, sometimes we need to rant.
7. Move on
If you're upset about a critique partner and something they said (or maybe many somethings) and feel like your writing isn't good enough for publishing, remember that we are all learning. You're not as bad as you think. If you were the worst writer in the world and there was no hope for you, then no one would be trying to help you. What they see is your potential and what you could be if you improve. Focus on that.
Writing is a craft that you can never perfect. There's always room as a writer to get better and challenge yourself. You never have to worry that the book you just wrote is the best book of your career because you'll write the next book using all the knowledge you learned from the previous one and do something even better.
It actually makes writing exciting because you can only achieve more and grow. Things will get better from here.
---
If you'd like to read more articles on writing like this, please go to my site: The New Writer's Guide To Writing, Publishing, And More.
7 comments:
Great post! Even though my CP's and I get along swimmingly, when I receive random crits elsewhere that I disagree with or that make me feel less of a writer, I have to take a moment and reflect on what they're saying so I can learn and grow as a writer.
Great advice! As a mom of two athletes, they played in several sports which had 24 hour rules - parents/kids,,, couldn't complain to the coaching staff about any incident for 24 hours. It helped everyone keep cooler heads :)
1, 4, 5, and 7 are the best, especially 4 :) 4 is huge because NO opinion is wrong. Even if your partner's justification is... off, they found a part of your book they didn't connect with, and thus, EVERY critique should be used to impliment change in your book. Thats just my belief :)
That is perfect advice for everyone, and not just for writers. We could apply it to many occasions when people upset us.
Banned complain !! Complaining only causes life and mind become more severe. Enjoy the rhythm of the problems faced. no problem no life, no matter did not learn, so enjoy it :)
Tips Pencegahan Diabetes
Perkembangan Bayi Dalam Kandungan Usia 20 Minggu
Olahraga Baik Bagi Penderita Diabetes
Cara Menghilangkan Sakit Tulang Belikat
Obat Akibat Benjolan Asam Urat
Ciri Ciri Perempuan Terkena Penyakit Kanker Rahim
Tatalaksanan TBC Kelenjar
Hello mates, how is everything, and what you would like to say on the topic of this post, in my view its really remarkable in support of me.
Thank you, I've just been looking for information approximately this subject for a long time and yours is the best I've found out till now. But, what about the bottom line? Are you positive about the source?
Post a Comment